<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Politics and Hypocrisy &#187; George Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/category/george-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com</link>
	<description>Archive Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama Picks Running Mate</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/08/23/obama-picks-running-mate/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/08/23/obama-picks-running-mate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[joe biden]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice president]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandhypocrisy.com/?p=1675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The message that liberals and bloggers have been waiting for with baited breath for days has finally come, at 3:22 this morning?. According to sources close to me (Twitter/TweetDeck) Barack Obama has chosen Joe Biden to be the 2nd line on the ticket in November.
More to come for sure but what is your initial reaction? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://twitter.com/BarackObama/statuses/896373763">message</a> that liberals and bloggers have been waiting for with baited breath for days has finally come, at 3:22 this morning?. According to sources close to me (Twitter/<a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/beta/">TweetDeck</a>) Barack Obama has chosen Joe Biden to be the 2nd line on the ticket in November.</p>
<p>More to come for sure but what is your initial reaction? Why the middle of the night annoucement?</p>
<p>UPDATE: By the way, I never got the text message or the email announcing the choice, at least not yet. I guess the new technology thing that Obama has embraced still has a few bugs to be worked out.</p>
<p>Also, after a few minutes thinking this over I am not sure this choice does much for me. Does Obama, the so called candidate of change, need a 30 year Washington insider with a penchant for saying stupid things as a running mate?. Don&#8217;t we already have that on the Republican ticket?</p>
<p>At least now Obama can probably put Delaware in the win column&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/08/23/obama-picks-running-mate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roberts Questions Obama For Taking Time Off</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/08/10/roberts-questions-obama-for-taking-time-off/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/08/10/roberts-questions-obama-for-taking-time-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vacation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandhypocrisy.com/2008/08/10/roberts-questions-obama-for-taking-time-off/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC&#8217;s Cokie Roberts doesn&#8217;t think that Barack Obama taking a week off makes any sense especially in exotic Hawaii. You mean other than the fact that he is from Hawaii Cokie? On this morning&#8217;s &#8220;This Week&#8221; she took issue with his vacation choices.
ROBERTS: &#8212; does not make any sense whatsoever. I know his grandmother lives [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC&#8217;s <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200808100001">Cokie Roberts</a> doesn&#8217;t think that Barack Obama taking a week off makes any sense especially in exotic Hawaii. You mean other than the fact that he is from Hawaii Cokie? On this morning&#8217;s &#8220;<em>This Week</em>&#8221; she took issue with his vacation choices.</p>
<blockquote><p>ROBERTS: &#8212; does not make any sense whatsoever. I know his grandmother lives in Hawaii and I know Hawaii is a state, but it has the look of him going off to some sort of foreign, exotic place. He should be in Myrtle Beach, and, you know, if he&#8217;s going to take a vacation at this time.</p></blockquote>
<p>Though I guess that I would have to agree with her on one point. Why is he taking vacation now when he can take all he wants if he wins the White House. George W set the precidence as he is on pace to <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/pressclips/archives/2008/01/numb_and_number_1.php">take almost 500 days</a> during his 8 tears in office. I am sure Obama can use a similar vacation schedule to keep his batteries recharged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/08/10/roberts-questions-obama-for-taking-time-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;W&#8217;: In A Theater Near You Soon</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/07/30/w-in-a-theater-near-you-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/07/30/w-in-a-theater-near-you-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oliver stone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[w]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandhypocrisy.com/?p=1170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posting will be light today as I am on the road in Aberdeen and Watertown so while I&#8217;m gone I thought I would post the trailer to the latest Oliver Stone bio-pic titled &#8220;W&#8221; for you viewing pleasure.
Stone&#8217;s latest stars Josh Brolin as George W. and is scheduled to hit theaters in October just in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/w.jpg" alt="" width="81" height="109" align="left" />Posting will be light today as I am on the road in Aberdeen and Watertown so while I&#8217;m gone I thought I would post the trailer to the latest Oliver Stone bio-pic titled &#8220;W&#8221; for you viewing pleasure.</p>
<p>Stone&#8217;s latest stars Josh Brolin as George W. and is scheduled to hit theaters in October just in time to see before the November elections. <a href="http://rawstory.com//news/2008/Bush_movie_trailer_pulled_from_YouTube_0728.html">Raw Story</a> reports that the movie appears to focus &#8220;<em>on George W. Bush&#8217;s transition from youthful drunken lout to President of the United States</em>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Of course this is all based on a 2 minute trailer but there has to be a reason that Stone rushed this to completion so that it would air <em>before</em> the election right? And I&#8217;ll bet it isn&#8217;t to help the GOP&#8217;s chances either but that&#8217;s just me talkin&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<div class="youtube-video"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aEyJ2kdaaTQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aEyJ2kdaaTQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/07/30/w-in-a-theater-near-you-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Today&#8217;s Democrats Were In Charge During Nixon Years</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/07/17/if-todays-democrats-were-in-charge-during-nixon-years/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/07/17/if-todays-democrats-were-in-charge-during-nixon-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dennis kucinich]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[impeachment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandhypocrisy.com/?p=898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the announcement by Nancy Pelosi that she might allow Dennis Kucinich&#8217;s impeachment resolution to be debated, but not voted on, the following cartoon seemed to be right on the mark.

(h/t - Madfloridian)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the announcement by Nancy Pelosi that she might allow Dennis Kucinich&#8217;s impeachment resolution to be debated, but not voted on, the following cartoon seemed to be right on the mark.</p>
<p><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://politicsandhypocrisy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/luckovichcartoon.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>(h/t - <a href="http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/2368">Madfloridian</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/07/17/if-todays-democrats-were-in-charge-during-nixon-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now That&#8217;s What I Call Stimulation</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/07/02/now-thats-what-i-call-stimulation/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/07/02/now-thats-what-i-call-stimulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandhypocrisy.com/2008/07/02/now-thats-what-i-call-stimulation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bush&#8217;s economic stimulus plan has worked, at least for one industry.
An unforeseen and surprising beneficiary of the Economic Stimulus Plan, a plan that George Bush contends will &#8220;boost our economy and encourage job creation,&#8221; has surfaced this week. An independent market-research firm, AIMRCo (Adult Internet Market Research Company), has discovered that many websites focused on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush&#8217;s economic stimulus plan has worked, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20080702/pl_usnw/president_bush_boosts_porn_industry_with_economic_stimulus_plan__according_to_aimrco">at least for one industry</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>An unforeseen and surprising beneficiary of the Economic Stimulus Plan, a plan that <span id="lw_1214999786_0" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; cursor: pointer;">George Bush</span> contends will &#8220;boost our economy and encourage job creation,&#8221; has surfaced this week. An independent market-research firm, AIMRCo (<span id="lw_1214999786_1" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: medium none; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">Adult Internet Market Research Company</span>), has discovered that many websites focused on adult or erotic material have experienced an upswing in sales in the recent weeks since checks have appeared in millions of Americans&#8217; mailboxes across the country.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not what the conservatives including President Bush planned but at least something is being &#8220;stimulated&#8221; by the program&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/07/02/now-thats-what-i-call-stimulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like Father Like Son?</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/06/26/like-father-like-son/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/06/26/like-father-like-son/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdmoderate.com/2008/06/26/like-father-like-son/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dad gets an aircraft carrier named after him and sonny gets, well, Mr 23% gets&#8230;
From the Department of Damned-With-Faint-Praise, a group going by the
regal-sounding name of the Presidential Memorial Commission of San
Francisco is planning to ask voters here to change the name of a
prize-winning water-treatment plant on the shoreline to the George W.
Bush Sewage Plant.
Well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dad gets an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_George_H._W._Bush_%28CVN-77%29">aircraft carrier</a> named after him and sonny gets, well, Mr 23% <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/25/america/bush.php">gets</a>&#8230;<br />
<blockquote>From the Department of Damned-With-Faint-Praise, a group going by the<br />
regal-sounding name of the Presidential Memorial Commission of San<br />
Francisco is planning to ask voters here to change the name of a<br />
prize-winning water-treatment plant on the shoreline to the George W.<br />
Bush Sewage Plant.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well at least it is a prize winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/06/26/like-father-like-son/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saturday Funnies</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/06/14/saturday-funnies/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/06/14/saturday-funnies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdmoderate.com/?p=1588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Make sure you don&#8217;t have a mouthful while viewing and I wouldn&#8217;t watch if you have Victorian sensibilities but otherwise enjoy.

(h/t - Americablog)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make sure you don&#8217;t have a mouthful while viewing and I wouldn&#8217;t watch if you have Victorian sensibilities but otherwise enjoy.</p>
<div class="youtube-video"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="300" height="251" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JjVZd9ACMng&amp;hl=en" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="300" height="251" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JjVZd9ACMng&amp;hl=en" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></div>
<p>(h/t - <a href="http://www.americablog.com/2008/06/and-now-for-something-little-lighter.html">Americablog</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/06/14/saturday-funnies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Slapped Again</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/06/12/bush-slapped-again/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/06/12/bush-slapped-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdmoderate.com/?p=1584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the AP
WASHINGTON (AP) &#8212; The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay have rights under the Constitution to challenge their detention in U.S. civilian courts.
In its third rebuke of the Bush administration&#8217;s treatment of prisoners, the court ruled 5-4 that the government is violating the rights of prisoners being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://topnews.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SCOTUS_GUANTANAMO?SITE=KELOTV&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">AP</a></p>
<blockquote><p>WASHINGTON (AP) &#8212; The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay have rights under the Constitution to challenge their detention in U.S. civilian courts.</p>
<p>In its third rebuke of the Bush administration&#8217;s treatment of prisoners, the court ruled 5-4 that the government is violating the rights of prisoners being held indefinitely and without charges at the U.S. naval base in Cuba. The court&#8217;s liberal justices were in the majority.</p>
<p>Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the court, said, &#8220;The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What is surprising is that 4 justices actually thought otherwise. I guess it is too bad for Bush that he didn&#8217;t have the opportunity to stack the court before getting his hand slapped for the 3rd straight time and hopefully he won&#8217;t have the chance before the Democrats take over in January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/06/12/bush-slapped-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like Clockwork</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/05/28/like-clockwork/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/05/28/like-clockwork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdmoderate.com/?p=1545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest former Bushie to write a book after leaving the Bush umbrella is experiencing the same smear machine that awaits anyone willing to talk bad about our King President. Former press secretary Scott McClellan&#8217;s less than flattering new book describes a propaganda machine that would have made Joseph Goebbels envious and within hours of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest former Bushie to write a book after leaving the Bush umbrella is experiencing the same smear machine that awaits anyone willing to talk bad about our <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">King</span> President. Former press secretary Scott McClellan&#8217;s less than flattering <a href="http://www.amazon.com/What-Happened-Washingtons-Culture-Deception/dp/1586485563/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1211996001&amp;sr=1-1">new book</a> describes a <a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/05/28/bombshell_book_rocks_white_house.html">propaganda machine</a> that would have made <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goebbels">Joseph Goebbels</a> envious and within hours of tidbits of the yet to be released book becoming public, it started in earnest.</p>
<p>First came former Bush puppet master and current McCain advisor Karl <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Marx</span> Rove who compared McClellan to a <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/05/karl_rove_mcclellan_the_one_mi.html">left-wing blogger</a> on Hannity and Colmes. He was followed soon thereafter by former Homeland Security adviser Frances Townsend (aka pot) whom called McClellan <a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0805/27/acd.01.html">“self-serving” and “disingenuous.”</a> (kettle). Closing things out today (so far), Bush spokeswoman Dana Perino put the proverbial &#8220;smear icing on the cake&#8221; when she labeled him simply, a “<a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/28/1070681.aspx">disgruntled</a>” employee.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/28/rove-townsend-mcclellan/">Think Progress</a> points out, McClellan isn&#8217;t alone in his criticism of the administration or in the backlash that resulted from the blind follower&#8217;s brigade. He joins the likes of Alan Greenspan, Matthew Dowd, and Richard Clarke among others whom have left the administration and afterwards been crucified for speaking ill of our fearless leader.</p>
<p>While the Bush machine&#8217;s response is to be expected based on their history, one might start to wonder if this is only a precursor to what will come out starting in January 2009 when the smear machine leaves the Bush nest and has to start looking back on their legacies. Do they want to continue to be associated with the <a href="http://www.sdmoderate.com/2008/05/01/a-president-for-the-ages/">worst President in our history</a> whom has done more to circumvent the Constitution than anyone in our lifetime or will they start burning the bridge connecting them with the last 8 years of Mr &#8220;Miserable Failure&#8221;?</p>
<p>Reserve some quiet time in the years to come. I predict there will be some interesting reading in our future that won&#8217;t have the smear machine waiting to greet it when it comes out.</p>
<p>UPDATE: I meant to mention this but forgot but <a href="http://hoghouseblog.com/2008/05/28/i-didnt-see-this-one-coming/">Denise Ross</a> didn&#8217;t. All through the smear campaign to this point, no one has come out to deny anything that McClellan wrote. I guess they figure it is easier to discredit him than to try and explain away (i.e. lie) what he documents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/05/28/like-clockwork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Times Must Be Rough</title>
		<link>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/05/14/times-must-be-rough/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/05/14/times-must-be-rough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Iraqi Occupation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdmoderate.com/2008/05/14/times-must-be-rough/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated Below
I guess we all need to make some sort of sacrifice because of the war in Iraq.
US President George W. Bush said in an interview out Tuesday that he quit playing golf in 2003 out of respect for the families of US soldiers killed in the conflict in Iraq, now in its sixth year.
&#8220;I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Updated Below</strong></em></p>
<p>I guess we all need to <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080513/pl_afp/usiraqpoliticsbushgolf_080513212030">make some sort of sacrifice</a> because of the war in Iraq.</p>
<blockquote><p>US President George W. Bush said in an interview out Tuesday that he quit playing golf in 2003 out of respect for the families of US soldiers killed in the conflict in Iraq, now in its sixth year.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal,&#8221; he said in an interview for Yahoo! News and Politico magazine.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the commander-in-chief playing golf,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I feel I owe it to the families to be in solidarity as best as I can with them.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Does he have even the smallest clue as to how that sounds?</p>
<p>UPDATE: Not only does Bush seem clueless about how this sounds, it appears <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/14/bushs-golf-story-doesnt-hold-water/">he lied about it as well</a>. And finally, Keith Olbermann puts the whole Bush Yahoo/Politico interview in perspective.</p>
<p><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/24635229#24635229" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.bob-schwartz.com/2008/05/14/times-must-be-rough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
